|
|
page last edited on
23-07-2010
EPBRS
Declarations - Lesvos, Greece, 23-26 May 2003
The mission of the European Platform for Biodiversity
Research Strategy (EPBRS) is to ensure that research contributes to
halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010.

Recommendations of the participants
of the European Platform
for Biodiversity Research Strategy meeting
held under the Greek
presidency of the EU
Lesvos, Greece, 23-26 May 2003
concerning
“Biotic Resources in a
Changing World: Science for Better Governance"
“The Earth provides
enough to satisfy every man’s needs, but not every man’s greed.”
Mahatma Gandhi
|
To gain the
knowledge necessary to halt biodiversity loss by 2010, the
participants of this meeting agreed that the following research
action points have high priority:
-
improve
understanding of our dependence on biodiversity:
-
investigate the
impacts of biodiversity change on ecosystem functions and on the
supply of ecosystem goods and services,
-
determine the
costs of not halting biodiversity loss, including the social and
environmental consequences,
-
initiate long-term
biodiversity assessment by means of targeted research and
comprehensive long-term monitoring programmes, that integrate
historical data and pursue comparative temporal and spatial
studies,
-
improve the
knowledge on status and trends of biodiversity and biotic
resources in the acceding and candidate countries to obtain
comparable data for the assessment of biodiversity in the enlarged
EU,
-
improve
understanding of human attitudes towards biotic resources and the
drivers of biodiversity change,
-
understand the
distribution of economic, social and environmental costs and
benefits of conservation and use of biodiversity and its
implication on decision-making,
-
synthesise
scientific knowledge on ecological changes and improve its
application to halting biodiversity loss.
|
-
promoting the
development of interdisciplinary research teams to
analyse conflicts over
sustainable use of biotic resources and the conservation of
biodiversity and where possible propose
methods for managing these conflicts;
-
improving the science
base in adaptive management;
-
developing adaptive
approaches to better integrate biodiversity concerns into other policy
sectors:
-
by analysing
implementation;
-
by investigating how
biodiversity policy transposes through different levels of
governance;
-
by studying the
interaction between the relevant international agreements and
regional policies;
-
investigating
methodologies to communicate the importance of biodiversity to the
general public and to decision-makers;
-
combining local and
global knowledge and values with scientific knowledge, develop
evidence-based decision-making structures and implement them at local
level;
-
applying best practices
in biodiversity management and governance in the enlarged EU, taking
into consideration the environmental and cultural characteristics of
the countries and regions.
The above research priorities stemmed in particular
from the following considerations:
-
biotic resources
comprise that fraction of biodiversity found in marine, terrestrial
and freshwater ecosystems from which human societies derive raw
materials and services for food, shelter, fuel, health and recreation;
-
the demands of the
increasing human population and the inequitable and unsustainable
consumption of the world’s biotic resources give rise to increasingly
urgent and complex dilemmas;
-
policy is constrained
by limited scientific knowledge about the functional and compositional
complexities of biodiversity and the sustainable use of biotic
resources;
-
understanding
mechanisms leading to the loss of biodiversity and the consequent
erosion of biotic resources requires close integration and
collaboration between researchers working on the drivers of
biodiversity loss;
-
collaboration with
local people can greatly advance scientific understanding of
biodiversity,
-
rapidly developing
science and technology have the potential to mitigate some - but not
all – of the problems related to the erosion of biotic resources;
-
good governance of
biotic resources, involving clear two-way dialogue between researchers
and stakeholders, results in improved conditions for both humans and
ecosystems;
-
biodiversity
conservation is a societal choice and an essential arena for action
lies in human attitudes and behaviour;
-
both intrinsic and
utilitarian values give reason to conserve biodiversity and to take
action to halt biodiversity loss.
|